Ask Your Preacher - Archives
OLD TESTAMENT
Thar' Be Dragons
Thursday, March 17, 2016Is the Leviathan in the book of Job a dragon?Sincerely,
Dragons Are Cool!
Dear Dragons Are Cool,
We don’t know exactly what animal the Leviathan was, but we do know that it doesn’t match the description of any currently living animal. The Leviathan is described as being very large (Job 41:12), tough-skinned (Job 41:15-17), wild and undomesticated (Job 41:1-5), and potentially sea-dwelling (Job 41:31-32).
Some think that the Leviathan may be the answer to all the many dragon stories that are found across countless cultures. In Job 41:18-21, God describes the Leviathan as flashing light when it sneezes, smoking from its nostrils, starting fires with its breath, and shooting flames from its mouth. Such descriptions do indeed sound quite a lot like the description of a dragon. It may very well be that the Leviathan is one of the dragons illustrated in countless ancient drawings.
Job's Lament
Wednesday, March 16, 2016Explain Job 3:14-16, please.Sincerely,
Job Placement
Dear Job Placement,
Job chapter three is Job’s lament over his own existence. Job starts the chapter off by expressing how he wishes he was never born (Job 3:1-3). The entire chapter continues with this theme. Job has been so completely decimated in his life that he wishes he had never lived at all. He has lost his family, his wealth, and his health. Job 3:14-16 is best understood if you go all the way back to Job 3:11. Job is lamenting the fact that he did not die right after his birth. In Job 3:14-15, he points that if he were dead, instead of suffering, he would be resting with the kings, princes, and rulers of old whose castles now lie in ruins. In Job 3:16, he simply re-emphasizes that he wishes he had died as an infant instead of living to see the suffering that had occurred in his adult life.
Book, Chapter, Verse
Thursday, March 03, 2016I have a friend who always wants to talk about religion but doesn't understand my beliefs. I am a christian, and when I try to explain to her that the Bible is literally interpreted, she doesn't understand and replies with, "Well, that’s your and your church's interpretation of the Bible" and "The same literal verse can mean different things to different people." What verses or explanation can I use as examples of how the Bible should be interpreted and why? Thank you.Sincerely,
Literally Puzzled
Dear Literally Puzzled,
What you are trying to do is prove to your friend that the Bible is God’s literal word and that God intends for it to be understood in a definite fashion. Here are a couple of different ways to try and get this concept across to your friend:
- Peter said that the Bible is not a matter of our own private interpretation (2 Pet 1:20-21). When God spoke, He didn’t mean for His Words to be interpreted how we wished. In fact, the apostle Paul condemns our own interpretation as “perverting” God’s Word (Gal 1:6-7). There is a right and a wrong way to read the Scriptures.
- If there is more than one correct way to interpret the Scriptures, it would be impossible to have unity. Unity can only happen if we agree on the same standards. If people each have their own personal interpretation of the Scriptures, there is no common standard to build unity upon. God is not the author of confusion (1 Cor 14:33). God commands us to have unity, and that there is only one faith (Eph 4:3-6). Show your friend Ephesians chapter four and explain that unity cannot happen without a single standard.
- God purposely made sure that every word of the Bible was exactly as He intended it to be (Matt 5:18). Everything that the prophets wrote was directly from the mind of God (1 Cor 2:12-13). If God put that much effort into preserving the accuracy and detail of the Bible, we cannot disregard that. We must be as accurate in our reading of the Bible as God was in writing it.
- Jesus believed there was a right and a wrong way to read the Bible. He accused the Pharisees of disregarding God’s teachings (Matt 21:42). He also told the Sadducees that they didn’t understand the Scriptures (Matt 22:29). If Jesus says there is a right and a wrong way to view the Scriptures, then we must make sure we are rightly discerning God’s Word.
There is no guarantee any of these things will work with your friend, but we wish you the very best as you try and share the Gospel. Hopefully, she will be willing to listen with an open and honest heart.
Slavery
Wednesday, March 02, 2016I know slavery existed in the Bible, but does that mean it’s not wrong?
Sincerely,
Abolitionist
Dear Abolitionist,
The Bible does not ever directly condemn slavery, but it does condemn treating slaves like property. In the Old Testament, God allowed a bankrupt Jew to sell himself as a slave to pay off his debts, however he was not to be abused or mistreated by his owner (Lev 25:39-40). God reiterates this idea in the New Testament. Slaves are to serve their masters loyally and faithfully (1 Tim 6:1, Tit 2:9). Masters are to treat their slaves as fellow humans, without threatening or hurting them (Eph 6:9). Masters are to be just and fair to their slaves (Col 4:1). God never says it is wrong to have slaves, but He very clearly denounces the brutality that we often associate with slavery. If a slave master lived as God commanded, he would treat his slaves as hired hands… and many christians did just that in the first century.
However, God does make it clear that being a slave is a less than desirable situation. Slavery is a reality that exists within various parts of the world, so it must be dealt with from a Biblical perspective, but freedom is always a better option (1 Cor 7:21).
God's Not A Girl
Thursday, February 04, 2016Is it just me, or is this (Best-Selling Bible May Get Gender Update – NYDailyNews) just plain ridiculous? I hope I'm not the only one offended by people trying to inject political correctness into God's word.Sincerely,
He, She, & It
Dear He, She, & It,
We have written before on the problems that can be found in the NIV version (read “New International Version” for more details). Whenever translators begin to use their authority and position to alter God’s Word, there is a problem. Changing the pronouns within the Scriptures to be more gender neutral is not a translation issue; it is a personal agenda.
We live in a world that is increasingly politically correct, even to the point of being ludicrous. Unfortunately, this is another example of people using the translation of God’s Word as an opportunity to further their individual attitudes. This is one more symptom that occurs when we are wise in our own eyes (Isa 5:21).