Ask Your Preacher - Archives
NEW TESTAMENT
Blood In The Pudding
Monday, June 05, 2017Is drinking one’s blood or the blood of others a sin or just not wanted to be done?
Sincerely, What’s For Dinner?
Dear What’s For Dinner?,
Although there is some controversy over the subject, drinking blood is a sin.The Jews knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that drinking blood was a sin (Gen 9:4).A Jewish law is not the same as a christian law though, so we must find a New Testament teaching on the subject.In Acts 15:19-20, a letter is sent by the apostles to all the Gentile christians telling them to abstain from drinking blood or eating meat that had been strangled (thus leaving the blood in the meat).Drinking blood is put side by side with fornication as something to be avoided at all cost.The life is in the blood, and therefore it should be treated with respect (Lev 17:11).
Stake Out
Tuesday, May 30, 2017I got into a pretty heated argument the other day with my girlfriend. She is a Jehovah’s Witness, and I am a christian. I was talking about the day Jesus died, and I mentioned the cross. She, in turn, began to tell me that all christians got the translation wrong and that it was actually a stake. I'm not looking to settle a score, but I would like to know some insight on this subject if you could help. Thanks and keep up the good work!Sincerely,
Feeling A Little Cross
Dear Feeling A Little Cross,
The Greek word is ‘stauros’, and it means ‘stake, post, or cross’. The word can mean any of those three things depending upon the context. Like many words in English, Greek words often require context to give the specific definition. In the case of Jesus’ crucifixion, the word ‘cross’ is appropriate because the context tells us they nailed Him to it (Jhn 20:25, Lk 24:40)… a historically verifiable technique used by Romans for crucifixion upon a cross.
His And Her Beliefs
Friday, April 21, 2017I have been married to the most wonderful man I have ever known for over nine years. We have a wonderful marriage; we rarely argue, we discuss things fairly, and we communicate and compromise very well. We are strong together and very, very happy. There is only one problem. I am an atheist. My husband is a christian. I do not try to change his mind or 'convert' him. I was raised in a christian home, so I understand his feelings about my faith... or lack thereof. He worries about my salvation, and he is quite upset that when he gets to heaven, I won't be there. Becoming an atheist was a slow and emotional process for me. When we married, I 'believed' in God, but my belief was based only on fear. I did a lot of research on many different religions of the world, and the more I read, the more atheism made sense to me. I love him, and his faith makes him happy, so I am 100% supportive of it. But I cannot force myself to believe in something that I don't.My husband and I found a Bible verse a few days ago, and I have asked every christian person that I personally know, and the answer is always different, so my husband suggested I find a website like yours (thank you, Google) and ask the experts, so to speak. I do not know what your experience is, but I am assuming that since you are a preacher, and this is your line of work, maybe you can help clarify our interpretation of this verse. Everyone interprets the Bible differently, and who is to say which interpretation is correct? That's where I'm hoping you will come in. My hope is to put my husband's mind at ease. We do not intend to divorce. That is NOT an option. We have heard that from another preacher, so I'll just tell you up front that although we will value and appreciate your opinion, your opinion will not end our marriage.
1 Corinthians 7:12-14 says:
"To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband.”Dictionary.com defines sanctify as such:
sanc·ti·fy [sangk-tuh-fahy]
–verb (used with object), -fied, -fy·ing.1. to make holy; set apart as sacred; consecrate.
2. to purify or free from sin
3. to impart religious sanction to; render legitimate or binding: to sanctify a vow.
4. to entitle to reverence or respect.
5. to make productive of or conducive to spiritual blessing.
Our interpretation, put bluntly, is that because of his faith, I get a free ticket to heaven (IF I'm wrong about my beliefs). My Aunt (who is VERY religious) says that my interpretation is impossible because the Bible says that the ONLY way to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven is to accept Christ as your Lord and Savior… and that my interpretation contradicts everything the Bible says (hence, my atheism). But you can look for yourself. The verse I quoted is in there, too.
So... please help us. Give us, especially my husband, some guidance in our situation. Thank you very much for your time.
Sincerely,
Atheist Bride
Dear Atheist Bride,
Whenever we deal with verses in the Bible, it is very important that we remember that no single verse can be viewed without comparing it with other verses. It is the sum of all God's Word on any given topic that gives us the truth (Ps 119:160). The only way for someone to be saved is through Christ (Jhn 14:6); it is impossible to be saved unless we accept Christ by faith (Eph 2:8).
However, the word 'sanctified' doesn't just refer to salvation. In its most basic sense, the word 'sanctify' simply means 'to be set apart'. People married to christians are different than those married to unbelievers. The constant influence and contact that occurs from being married to a christian increases your likelihood of ever obeying the truth. As 1 Cor 7:16 points out, that influence can eventually lead to the salvation of the unbelieving spouse. By no means does 1 Cor 7 imply that the unbeliever receives a free ticket to heaven... we all have to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling (Php 2:12).
On a separate note, we here at AYP can commiserate with your frustration over fear-based belief in God... we believe the scientific evidence should be the basis for belief in God. If you are ever interested, we would be happy to point you toward what we believe is the best evidence for God's existence. Otherwise, at the very least, hopefully we have provided some clarity on 1 Corinthians 7.
Spotting A Counterfeit
Tuesday, March 28, 2017Is Jesus real?Sincerely,
McCoy
Dear McCoy,
Absolutely! Jesus is real, and the Bible accounts of Him are also real. There are historical accounts of Jesus by an ancient writer named Josephus that attest to Jesus’ existence. Archaeological evidence of the church dates back to the first century… within a couple generations of when Jesus lived. This archaeological data is very important because it confirms that the message of Christ spread during a time in history when people could confirm His empty tomb, His miracles, and His hometown history. In short, if Jesus was a fake, the people of that time period would have stopped a false legend from spreading… but the opposite was true. Jesus’ church and message spread because the story was true and couldn’t be refuted. For more information on this topic, we highly recommend the book A Case For Christ by Lee Strobel.
The Just Justifier
Tuesday, March 21, 2017I am a saved christian. My question is: why did Jesus "have" to die on the cross for our sins? I know that He did. I also know that God does not have to abide by any formality or rules. He could have given us salvation without the shedding of Jesus' blood if He wanted to. Is it that He sent His only begotten Son to be sacrificed, just so we could see the love He has for us? I must admit, I feel His love because He did send His Son to die for me.Sincerely,
Pondering The Sacrifice
Dear Pondering The Sacrifice,
God sent Jesus to die on the cross, so He could be both a just God and a loving God. If God had simply forgiven us of our sins without paying for them, He would be a liar because God says that sin is deserving of eternal death (Rom 6:23). It wouldn’t be right for Him to simply remove our guilt without paying for it. It would be akin to a judge letting people go free simply because he liked them – a judge like that would be corrupt.
Instead, we see that God is both just and our justifier. Jesus’ blood pays the price of our sin (1 Jn 1:7). There are two ways to pay for sin. We can pay for the sin ourselves by spending eternity in hell, or God’s blood can cover the cost of sin. The Son of God came down and gave Himself to purchase us (Acts 20:28). Rom 3:25-26 says that God sent Jesus, so He could show that He was loving and still righteous.